Use cases

Four roles. Four different review risks.

Each route uses a distinct document, review problem, evidence boundary, and tracked handoff—not a generic role-name swap.

01 Independent consultantsReview consulting reports without losing the reasoning

A controlled AI editing workflow for consultants who need clear, defensible recommendations and a tracked Word handoff.

02 Policy and grant editorsEdit policy briefs and grant proposals without changing the commitment

Review policy and grant language with controlled AI suggestions while preserving evidence, commitments, and accountable wording.

03 Research leadsRefine research reports without overstating the findings

Controlled AI editing for research leads who need to preserve methods, findings, attribution, and caveats.

04 Senior reviewersMove executive memos from marked issues to decision-ready wording

A controlled review workflow for senior reviewers responsible for strategic memos, board papers, and final wording.